Public Notice Distribution List

To be added to the Regulatory Branch Public Notice email distribution list, please send an email to Rod Desk at CENAO-.REG_ROD@usace.army.mil 

NAO-2024-01108 (Mattameade Data Center, Caroline County, Virginia)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Norfolk District
Published Feb. 13, 2025
Expiration date: 3/15/2025

February 13, 2025
CENAO-WRR
NAO-2024-01108, VMRC# 24-2491

FEDERAL PUBLIC NOTICE
The District Commander has received a joint permit application for Federal and State permits as described below:

APPLICANT
Robb Truedinger, AWS Environmental Director
Amazon Data Services, Inc.
410 Terry Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98109

PROJECT LOCATION: 
The Project area is located directly southeast of the intersection of Interstate 95 and Mudd Tavern Road (Route 606) in both Spotsylvania and Caroline Counties, Virginia.

PROJECT SIZE: The Project is proposed within a 13-parcel area totaling approximately 1,143 acres.

NEAREST WATERWAY: Matta River

LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE: 38.1217430, -77.5008296

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: 
The applicant has proposed to construct a data center to be known as Mattameade Data Center. The project would include 11, two-story data center buildings, secure campus entrances and access roads, secondary entrances and internal and external circulation roads for emergency vehicles, parking lot and loading dock areas, one, one-story central administration building, sidewalks and pedestrian accessways, stormwater management facilities, security fence line, three substation pads, associated electrical utility infrastructure to connect the substations to the campus, recreational facilities including pickleball and basketball courts, water treatment plant, sewer lift station, water pump house and associated water storage tanks, and culverted stream crossings to facilitate access to and around the campus. The project would permanently impact 4.85 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands (PEM), 0.72 acre of palustrine forested wetlands (PFO), 0.05 acre of palustrine scrub shrub, and 3,153 linear feet of stream channel; temporarily impact 1.17 acres of PEM and 97 linear feet of stream channel; and permanently convert 0.11 acre of PFO to PEM.

AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION: 
The applicant has evaluated alternative sites and alternative layouts for the proposed project. These alternatives are discussed in the Joint Permit Application and are under review. The Corps will issue a permit for the proposed project only if all wetland and stream impacts have been avoided and

minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION:
The applicant has proposed to mitigate for wetland impacts by purchasing 6.48 wetland credits and 2,346 stream credits from an approved wetland/stream mitigation bank(s) authorized to sell credits within the 02080105 Hydologic Unit Code.

In addition, the applicant must obtain an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) assuring that applicable laws and regulations pertaining to water quality are not violated. 

A copy of the joint permit application can be found on the Virginia Marine Resources Commission’s website. Due to the large file size, the JPA has been broken into two parts:

Part 1: https://webapps.mrc.virginia.gov/public/habitat/getADD.php?id=220761

Part 2: https://webapps.mrc.virginia.gov/public/habitat/getADD.php?id=220765

AUTHORITY:
(  )      Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).
(x)      Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217) and Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia.
(  )      Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413).
(  )      Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 408 (Section 408)).

FEDERAL EVALUATION OF APPLICATION: 
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. The decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All of the proposal's relevant factors will be considered, including conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Environmental Protection Agency's "Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material" will also be applied (Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act).

The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public, federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of this proposed activity.  Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on communities with Environmental Justice concerns, endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Preliminary review of the application indicates that no EIS will be required.

Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Anyone may request a public hearing to consider this permit application by writing to the District Commander within 30 days of the date of this notice, stating specific reasons for holding the public hearing. The District Commander will then decide if a hearing should be held.

ENDANGERED SPECIES:
After conducting the Norfolk District Endangered Species Act (ESA) Project Review Process, the Corps has made the preliminary determination that:

There may be an effect to listed/proposed/candidate species and/or designated/proposed critical habitat under the ESA of 1973. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Information and Planning and Consultation (IPaC) Official Species List and Species Conclusion Table are attached for review and comment by the FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).

Additional information might change any of these findings.

HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES:
The Corps identified historic properties within the Corps permit area and area of potential effects. A cultural resources survey was conducted on the project site and a report prepared: “Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Mattameade Campus Project Site, Spotsylvania and Caroline Counties, Virginia and an associated Supplemental Report”, dated February 7, 2024, by R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates. The cultural resources survey and report are a reasonable and good faith effort to identify historic properties.

Historic Resources eligible for inclusion or included in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are in or near the Corps permit area or would likely be affected by the proposal.

Additional information may change any of these findings.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT:
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-267), requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH).

There are no EFH species or complexes in the Corps area of responsibility.

VIRGINIA’S COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM:
For compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended for projects located in Virginia’s Coastal Zone, the applicant must certify that federally licensed or permitted activities affecting Virginia's coastal uses or resources will be conducted in a manner consistent with the Virginia’s Coastal Zone Management Program (Virginia CZM Program), and obtain concurrence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Office of Environmental Impact Review (OEIR). It is the applicant’s responsibility to submit a consistency certification to the OEIR for concurrence or objection, and proof of concurrence must be submitted to the Corps prior to final permit issuance. A template federal consistency certification can be found in the Federal Consistency Manual here: https://www.deq.virginia.gov/our-programs/environmental-impact-review/federal-consistency.

For more information or to obtain a list of the enforceable policies of the Virginia CZM Program, contact the DEQ-OEIR at (804) 659-1915 or e-mail: bettina.rayfield@deq.virginia.gov.

The applicant has submitted concurrence.

VIRGINIA’S SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM:
The Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Certification Rule (Certification Rule, 40 CFR 121), effective September 11, 2020, requires certification, or waiver, for any license or permit that authorizes an activity that may result in a discharge. The scope of a CWA Section 401 certification is limited to ensuring that a discharge from a Federally licensed or permitted activity will comply with water quality requirements. To comply with the Virginia Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program and the Certification Rule, the applicant is responsible for adhering to the procedures outlined in the Certification Rule when requesting certification from the certifying authority, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. In accordance with Certification Rule part 121.12, the Corps will notify the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator when it has received a Department of the Army (DA) permit application and the related certification. The Administrator is responsible for determining whether the discharge may affect water quality in a neighboring jurisdiction. The DA permit may not be issued pending the conclusion of the Administrator’s determination of effects on neighboring jurisdictions.

COMMENT PERIOD: 
Comments on this project should be in writing and can be sent by either email to Emily.a.brooks@usace.army.mil, or by regular mail, addressed to the Norfolk District, Corps of Engineers (ATTN:  CENAO-WRR), 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA  23510-1011, and should be received by the close of business on March 15, 2025.

PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY: 
Comments and information, including the identity of the submitter, submitted in response to this Public Notice may be disclosed, reproduced, and distributed at the discretion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Information that is submitted in connection with this Public Notice cannot be maintained as confidential by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  Submissions should not include any information that the submitter seeks to preserve as confidential.

If you have any questions about this project or the permit process, contact

Emily Brooks, Emily.a.brooks@usace.army.mil, 757-201-7048.