Posting NAO-2021-03242 (Henricus Park Access Road, Chesterfield County, Virginia)

Published March 27, 2023
Expiration date: 4/26/2023

March 27, 2023


The District Commander has received a joint permit application for Federal and State permits as described below:

Mr. Bill Arel, PE
Chesterfield County
Department of Transportation
PO Box 51
Chesterfield, VA 23832

PROJECT LOCATION:  251 Henricus Park Road, Chesterfield, Virginia.

PROJECT SIZE: 45 acres


LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE: 37.3737, -77.3531

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE:  The proposed project includes construction of a new 1.2-mile two-lane access road and bridge with a shared use path for bikers and pedestrians over an oxbow to the James River.  The applicant’s stated purpose is to provide access to Henricus Park while the existing park access road (Coxendale Road) is closed to accommodate closure of the existing coal ash ponds at the Dominion Energy Chesterfield County Power Station. The proposed project will permanently impact 1.16 acres of tidal forested wetlands, 0.11 acres of tidal emergent wetlands, 0.52 acres of subaqueous bottom, conversion of 0.60 acres of tidal forested wetlands to scrub shrub/emergent wetlands, 0.37 acres of non-tidal forested wetlands, 0.29 acres of non-tidal palustrine scrub shrub wetlands, and conversion of 0.08 acres non-tidal forested wetlands to non-tidal emergent wetlands. The proposed project will temporarily impact 0.57 acres of tidal forested wetlands and 1.33 acres of subaqueous bottom. The proposed project will convert an existing stormwater basin to wetlands and includes conversion of 7.67 acres of palustrine open water to palustrine emergent and forested wetlands. A nutrient bank is currently present within the limits of the project boundary which has been purchased by the applicant (no nutrient credits have been sold to date). The nutrient bank limits will be adjusted to remove the road footprint from the bank limits.

AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION:  The applicant demonstrated avoidance and minimization by increasing the bridge span over the oxbow from 100 feet to 170 feet reducing the number of pilings in the oxbow and wetlands.

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: The applicant proposes to compensate for unavoidable impacts to 1.16 acres of tidal forested wetlands, 0.11 acres of tidal emergent wetlands and conversion of 0.60 acres of tidal forested wetlands by purchasing 3.03 tidal wetland credits for wetland impacts (2:1 ratio, 1:1 ratio and 1:1 ratio respectively) from an approved tidal wetland mitigation bank. The applicant proposes to compensate for unavailable impacts to 0.37 acres of non-tidal forested wetlands, 0.29 acres of non-tidal scrub shrub wetland, and conversion of 0.08 acres of non-tidal forested wetlands to non-tidal emergent wetlands by purchasing 1.26 non-tidal wetland credits (2:1 ratio, 1.5:1 ratio and 1:1 ratio respectively) from an approved wetland mitigation bank.

In addition, the applicant must obtain an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) assuring that applicable laws and regulations pertaining to water quality are not violated.  

A copy of the joint permit application can be found on the Virginia Marine Resources Commission’s website (click here).


(X)       Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403).

(X)       Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217) and Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia.

( )        Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413).

FEDERAL EVALUATION OF APPLICATION:  The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest.  The decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources.  The benefits which reasonably may be expected from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments.  All of the proposal's relevant factors will be considered, including conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.  The Environmental Protection Agency's "Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material" will also be applied (Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act).

The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public, federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of this proposed activity.  Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal.  To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above.  Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act.  Preliminary review of the application indicates that no EIS will be required.

Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.  Anyone may request a public hearing to consider this permit application by writing to the District Commander within 30 days of the date of this notice, stating specific reasons for holding the public hearing.  The District Commander will then decide if a hearing should be held.

ENDANGERED SPECIES: After conducting the Norfolk District Endangered Species Act (ESA) Project Review Process, the Corps has made the preliminary determination that:

There may be an effect to listed/proposed/candidate species and/or designated/proposed critical habitat under the ESA of 1973. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Information and Planning and Consultation (IPaC) Official Species List and Species Conclusion Table are attached for review and comment by the FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).

Additional information might change any of these findings.


Historic Resources eligible for inclusion or included in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) are in or near the Corps permit area or would likely be affected by the proposal.

Additional information may change any of these findings.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-267), requires all Federal agencies to consult with the NMFS on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH).

The James River contains EFH for the adult, juvenile, eggs, larvae, and neonate life stages of nine (9) species including Clearnose Skate, Black Sea Bass, Little Skate, Atlantic Herring, Red Hake, Winter Skate, Windowpane Flounder, Bluefish, and Summer Flounder. The habitat which this project would affect consists of shallow water, tidal forested wetlands and tidal emergent wetlands.  The proposed project is described in Proposed Work and Purpose, above. Our assessment of the project leads us to a preliminary determination that it will not have a substantial adverse effect on EFH and therefore expanded EFH consultation is not required.  Our rationale for this preliminary determination is based on the expected short-term nature of the direct impacts and minimal increases in turbidity or changes in water temperature caused by the proposed work and the absence of submerged aquatic vegetation.  Based on comments from the National Marine Fisheries Service in response to this public notice, further EFH consultation may be necessary.

VIRGINIA’S COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: For compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended for projects located in Virginia’s Coastal Zone, the applicant must certify that federally licensed or permitted activities affecting Virginia's coastal uses or resources will be conducted in a manner consistent with the Virginia’s Coastal Zone Management Program (Virginia CZM Program), and obtain concurrence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Office of Environmental Impact Review (OEIR). It is the applicant’s responsibility to submit a consistency certification to the OEIR for concurrence or objection, and proof of concurrence must be submitted to the Corps prior to final permit issuance. A template federal consistency certification can be found in the Federal Consistency Manual here: .  For more information or to obtain a list of the enforceable policies of the Virginia CZM Program, contact the DEQ-OEIR at (804) 659-1915 or e-mail:

The applicant has not submitted concurrence.

VIRGINIA’S SECTION 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM: The Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Certification Rule (Certification Rule, 40 CFR 121), effective September 11, 2020, requires certification, or waiver, for any license or permit that authorizes an activity that may result in a discharge. The scope of a CWA Section 401 certification is limited to ensuring that a discharge from a Federally licensed or permitted activity will comply with water quality requirements. To comply with the Virginia Section 401 Water Quality Certification Program and the Certification Rule, the applicant is responsible for adhering to the procedures outlined in the Certification Rule when requesting certification from the certifying authority, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. In accordance with Certification Rule part 121.12, the Corps will notify the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator when it has received a Department of the Army (DA) permit application and the related certification. The Administrator is responsible for determining whether the discharge may affect water quality in a neighboring jurisdiction. The DA permit may not be issued pending the conclusion of the Administrator’s determination of effects on neighboring jurisdictions.

COMMENT PERIOD:  Comments on this project should be in writing and can be sent by either email to, or by regular mail, addressed to the Norfolk District, Corps of Engineers (ATTN:  CENAO-WRR), 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA  23510-1011, and should be received by the close of business on April 26, 2023.

PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY:  Comments and information, including the identity of the submitter, submitted in response to this Public Notice may be disclosed, reproduced, and distributed at the discretion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  Information that is submitted in connection with this Public Notice cannot be maintained as confidential by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  Submissions should not include any information that the submitter seeks to preserve as confidential.

If you have any questions about this project or the permit process, contact

Ms. Julie S. Hamilton by phone at (804) 436-4725 or email at