The District Commander has received a joint application for Federal and State permits as described below
APPLICANT
Mr. Walter Beck
Vulcan Construction Materials, LP
5601 Ironbridge Parkway, Suite 201
Chester, Va. 23831
WATERWAY AND LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK
The project is located north of US Route 460, west of SR 226 (Cox Road) and south of SR 601 (River Road) adjacent to Cattail Run a tributary to the Appomattox and James Rivers in Dinwiddie County, Virginia.
PROPOSED WORK AND PURPOSE
The applicant proposes to expand the existing quarry pit on the 708-acre Vulcan Jack Quarry site. The purpose of the work is to extract minerals on a 180-acre portion to the east of the existing pit by extending the existing quarry pit and associated operations and to ensure the maximum extraction of minerals in the most efficient manner. The proposed Jack Quarry expansion will impact 20.85 acres of palustrine forested wetlands (PFO), 1.41 acres of palustrine scrub shrub wetlands (PSS) and 0.78 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands (PEM). The proposed Phase one will impact 6.99 acres of PFO, 0.56 acres of PSS, and 0.78 acres of PEM for a total of 8.33 acres of wetlands. Phase two will impact 2.24 acres of PFO and 0.85 acres of PSS. Phase three will impact 11.62 acres of PFO. The three phases will occur in five-year intervals and impacts will not take place until the specific phase begins. The applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization by avoiding approximately 21.52 acres of wetlands, 3,340 linear feet of stream channel and 11.31 acres of open water and minimizing the expansion only to the east of the existing quarry. Impacts will be compensated by purchasing 41.7 wetland credits for PFO (2:1 ratio), 2.12 credits for PSS (1.5:1 ratio) and 0.78 credits for PEM (1:1 ratio) for a total of 44.6 wetland credits. Phase one wetland credits will be purchased at the James River Mitigation Land bank and each subsequent phase will be purchased at the same bank based on availability at that time.
In addition to the required Department of the Army permit, the applicant must obtain a Virginia Water Protection Permit from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) assuring that applicable laws and regulations pertaining to water quality are not violated. Project drawings are attached.
AUTHORITY
Permits are required pursuant to Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217) and Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia.\
FEDERAL EVALUATION OF APPLICATION
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. The decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All of the proposal's relevant factors will be considered, including conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use classification, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Environmental Protection Agency's "Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material" will also be applied (Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act).
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Anyone may request a public hearing to consider this permit application by writing to the District Commander within 30 days of the date of this notice, stating specific reasons for holding the public hearing. The District Commander will then decide if a hearing should be held.
Preliminary review indicates that: (l) no environmental impact statement will be required; (2) after conducting the NAO ESA Project Review Process, no listed/proposed/candidate species and/or designated/proposed critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat. 884), as amended) will be affected. Based on this no effect determination, no further coordination with the Fish and Wildlife Service is required; and (3) no known properties eligible for inclusion or included in the National Register of Historic Places are in or near the permit area, or would likely be affected by the proposal. Additional information might change any of these findings.
For compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended for projects located in Tidewater, the applicant must certify that federally licensed or permitted activities affecting Virginia's coastal uses or resources will be conducted in a manner consistent with the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program (VCP) and obtain concurrence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Office of Environmental Impact Review (OEIR). We have not received a certification from the applicant prior to publication of this public notice. It is the applicant’s responsibility to submit a consistency certification to the Office of Environmental Impact Review for concurrence or objection and proof of concurrence must be submitted to the
Corp’s prior to final permit issuance. A template federal consistency certification can be found here: http://www.deq.state.va.us/Programs/EnvironmentalImpactReview/FederalConsistencyReviews.aspx#cert
For more information or to obtain a list of the enforceable policies of the VCP, contact the Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Environmental Impact Review at (804) 698-4330 or e-mail: ellie.irons@deq.virginia.gov or john.fisher@deq.virginia.gov
COMMENT PERIOD
Comments on this project should be made in writing, addressed to the Norfolk District, Corps of Engineers (ATTN: CENAO-WR-R), 803 Front Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096, and should be received by the close of business on July 29, 2013.
PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY
Comments and information, including the identity of the submitter, submitted in response to this Public Notice may be disclosed, reproduced, and distributed at the discretion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Information that is submitted in connection with this Public Notice cannot be maintained as confidential by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Submissions should not include any information that the submitter seeks to preserve as confidential.
If you have any questions about this project or the permit process, contact Ms. Julie S. Hamilton at julie.s.hamilton@usace.army.mil or 804-323-3783.
FOR THE DISTRICT COMMANDER:
Lynette R. Rhodes
Chief, Southern Virginia Regulatory Section
Attachment: Drawings