Published March 26, 2015
Expiration date: 4/26/2015

The district commander has received a joint application for federal and state permit modifications as described below:


Chesterfield County Economic Development Authority
Attn: Mr. Garrett Hart
9401 Courthouse Road, Suite B
Chesterfield, Virginia 23832

WATERWAY AND LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK:  The project site is approximately 248 acres and is located north of Bermuda Hundred Road, east of I-295, in Chesterfield County, Virginia. The site drains into Johnson Creek, a tributary to the James River.

PROPOSED WORK AND PURPOSE: The applicant proposes to continue construction of the Meadowville Technology Park. This phase of the project, known as Logistic Zones, consists of  the construction of building pads, buildings, parking, roads, utility lines and stormwater management facilities. As proposed, the project will permanently impact 4.63 acres of forested wetlands, 0.22 acre of emergent wetlands, 88 linear feet of stream channel, 8.1 acres of isolated (non-jurisdictional) wetlands and temporarily impact 517 square feet of forested wetlands. To mitigate for the proposed impacts, the applicant proposes to purchase wetland and stream credits from the Eastern Henrico Mitigation Bank or the Chickahominy Environmental Bank. Emergent wetlands and isolated forested wetlands will be mitigated for at a 1:1 ratio, forested wetlands at a 2:1 ratio. Stream impacts will be mitigated for by purchasing 87 stream credits. The applicant indicated that wetland impacts have been avoided and minimized by considering alternative layouts, alternative building conformation based on internal manufacturing constraints, required parking, and stormwater pond locations/conformations. Previously authorized permanent impacts for the Meadowville Technology Park are 3.7 acres of forested wetlands and 228 linear feet of stream channel.

In addition to the required Department of the Army permit, the applicant must obtain a Virginia Water Protection Permit/401 certification from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, assuring that applicable laws and regulations pertaining to water quality are not violated. Project drawings are attached.

AUTHORITY: Permits are required pursuant to Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act (Public Law 95-217) and Title 62.1 of the Code of Virginia.

FEDERAL EVALUATION OF APPLICATION: The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. The decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments.  All of the proposal's relevant factors will be considered, including conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use classification, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The Environmental Protection Agency's "Guidelines for Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material" will also be applied (Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act).

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of this proposed activity.  Any comments received will be considered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

Anyone may request a public hearing to consider this permit application by writing to the district commander within 30 days of the date of this notice, stating specific reasons for holding the public hearing. The district commander will then decide if a hearing should be held.

This project was previously coordinated with the resource agencies. Preliminary review indicates that: (l) no environmental impact statement will be required; (2) after conducting the NAO ESA Project Review Process, the following listed/proposed/candidate species and/or designated/proposed critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat. 884), as amended may be affected: Swamp pink and Northern  long eared bat. Based on this determination, further coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is required; and (3) no known properties eligible for inclusion or included in the National Register of Historic Places are in or near the permit area, or would likely be affected by the proposal. Additional information might change any of these findings.

For compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended for projects located in Tidewater, the applicant must certify that federally licensed or permitted activities affecting Virginia's coastal uses or resources will be conducted in a manner consistent with the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program (VCP) and obtain concurrence from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), Office of Environmental Impact Review (OEIR). We have not received a certification from the applicant prior to publication of this public notice. It is the applicant’s responsibility to submit a consistency certification to the Office of Environmental Impact Review for concurrence or objection and proof of concurrence must be submitted to the Corps prior to final permit issuance. A template federal consistency certification can be found here:

For more information or to obtain a list of the enforceable policies of the VCP, contact the Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Environmental Impact Review at

COMMENT PERIOD: Comments on this project should be made in writing, addressed to the Norfolk District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Richmond Field Office, 9100 Arboretum Parkway, Suite 235, Richmond, Virginia 23236, or by e-mail at and should be received by the close of business on  April 26, 2015.

PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY: Comments and information, including the identity of the submitter, submitted in response to this Public Notice may be disclosed, reproduced, and distributed at the discretion of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  Information that is submitted in connection with this Public Notice cannot be maintained as confidential by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Submissions should not include any information that the submitter seeks to preserve as confidential.

If you have any questions about this project or the permit process, please contact Dr. Silvia Gazzera at (804) 212-6817;